Quantum Proofs of Proximity
نویسندگان
چکیده
We initiate the systematic study of QMA algorithms in setting property testing, to which we refer as proofs proximity (QMAPs). These are quantum query that receive explicit access a sublinear-size untrusted proof and required accept inputs having xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">Π reject xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">ε-far from mathvariant="normal">Π, while only probing minuscule portion their input.We investigate complexity landscape this model, showing QMAPs can be xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">exponentially stronger than both classical proofs proximity testers. To end, extend methodology Blais, Brody, Matulef (Computational Complexity, 2012) prove testing lower bounds via reductions communication complexity. This also resolves question raised 2013 by Montanaro de Wolf (cf. Theory Computing, 2016).Our algorithmic results include purpose an framework enables speedups for expressive class properties, namely, those succinctly xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">decomposable. A consequence is algorithm verify Parity xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">n-bit string with xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">O(n2/3) queries length. propose graph bipartitneness, lies outside family, there speedup.
منابع مشابه
Optimal Proximity Proofs Revisited
Distance bounding protocols become important since wireless technologies become more and more common. Therefore, the security of the distance bounding protocol should be carefully analyzed. However, most of the protocols are not secure or their security is proven informally. Recently, Boureanu and Vaudenay defined the common structure which is commonly followed by most of the distance bounding ...
متن کاملOptimal Proximity Proofs
Provably secure distance-bounding is a rising subject, yet an unsettled one; indeed, very few distance-bounding protocols, with formal security proofs, have been proposed. In fact, so far only two protocols, namely SKI (by Boureanu et al.) and FO (by Fischlin and Onete), offer all-encompassing security guaranties, i.e., resistance to distance-fraud, mafia-fraud, and terrorist-fraud. Matters lik...
متن کاملZero-Knowledge Proofs of Proximity
Interactive proofs of proximity (IPPs) are interactive proofs in which the verifier runs in time sub-linear in the input length. Since the verifier cannot even read the entire input, following the property testing literature, we only require that the verifier reject inputs that are far from the language (and, as usual, accept inputs that are in the language). In this work, we initiate the study...
متن کاملProofs of Proximity for Distribution Testing
Distribution testing is an area of property testing that studies algorithms that receive few samples from a probability distribution D and decide whether D has a certain property or is far (in total variation distance) from all distributions with that property. Most natural properties of distributions, however, require a large number of samples to test, which motivates the question of whether t...
متن کاملImplementing Probabilistically Checkable Proofs of Proximity
In this paper, we describe a proof-of-concept implementation of the probabilistically checkable proof of proximity (PCPP) system described by Ben-Sasson and Sudan in [BSS05]. In particular, we implement a PCPP prover and veri er for Reed-Solomon codes; the prover converts an evaluation of a polynomial on a linear set into a valid PCPP, while the veri er queries the evaluation and the PCPP to ch...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Quantum
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2521-327X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-10-13-834